FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 331.0 vs 355

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 331.0 and 355 are both aluminum grades. 331.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 8% more. In exchange, 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 1% for 331.0, and 331.0 is harder (95 HB vs 85 HB). 331.0 is stiffer (79 GPa vs 71 GPa) and 331.0 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, 355 machines more easily (good vs fair), 355 welds better (good vs fair), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 331.0 (standard, $$).

331.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

355Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

331.0 vs 355: properties

331.0355

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

30 GPa4.4 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
3%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
85 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 250 MPa36.3 ksi · Shear Strength 195 MPa28.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

538°C1,000 °F
546°C1,015 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

460 J/g198 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
36 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
60%

Weldability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

70%
80%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

29 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

241 kJ/m³
228 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

42 mm²/s
57.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
24

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 92 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355331.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability331.0355
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

331.0 vs 355 — frequently asked

Is 331.0 stronger than 355?

Yes. 331.0 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 331.0 or 355?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 331.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 331.0 or 355?

355. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (40/100) for 331.0; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then 331.0 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 331.0 and 355 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.