FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 328.0 vs 356

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 328.0 and 356 are both aluminum grades. 356 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 148 MPa (21.5 ksi) for 328.0, about 26% more; tensile strength follows at 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 1% for 328.0, and 356 is harder (80 HB vs 75 HB). 328.0 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous) and 356 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 126 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 356 machines more easily (very good vs good), 356 welds better (very good vs fair), and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 328.0 (standard, $$).

328.0Choose it when the part sees heat.

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

328.0 vs 356: properties

328.0356

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72.4 GPa10.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

148 MPa21.5 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
5%

Compressive Strength

155 MPa22.5 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
80 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Shear Strength 179 MPa26 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

610°C1,130 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

126 W/m·K72.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

31 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
120%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

185 MJ/kg79,536 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11.5 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

87 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.3 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

154 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.5 mm²/s
58.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356328.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability328.0356
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

328.0 vs 356 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than 328.0?

Yes. 356 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 148 MPa (21.5 ksi) for 328.0 — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 328.0 or 356?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 328.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 328.0 or 356?

356. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for 328.0; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then 328.0 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 328.0 and 356 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.