FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 328.0 vs 355

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 328.0 and 355 are both aluminum grades. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 148 MPa (21.5 ksi) for 328.0, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 1% for 328.0, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 75 HB). 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 126 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 355 welds better (good vs fair) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 328.0 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

328.0 vs 355: properties

328.0355

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

148 MPa21.5 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
3%

Compressive Strength

155 MPa22.5 ksi
—

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
85 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
546°C1,015 °F

Liquidus Temperature

610°C1,130 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

126 W/m·K72.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 175°C347 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

31 % IACS
36 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in
4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
60%

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Castability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

185 MJ/kg79,536 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

87 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.3 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

154 kJ/m³
228 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.5 mm²/s
57.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355328.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability328.0355
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

328.0 vs 355 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than 328.0?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 148 MPa (21.5 ksi) for 328.0 — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 328.0 or 355?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 328.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 328.0 or 355?

355. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (35/100) for 328.0.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 328.0 and 355 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.