FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 308.0 vs 356

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 308.0 and 356 are both aluminum grades. 356 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for 308.0, about 69% more; tensile strength follows at 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 195 MPa (28.3 ksi). 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 2% for 308.0, and 356 is harder (80 HB vs 70 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 308.0) and 308.0 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 356 welds better (very good vs poor) and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 308.0 (standard, $$).

308.0Choose it when the part sees heat.

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

308.0 vs 356: properties

308.0356

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72.4 GPa10.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
5%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
179 MPa26 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

33 HRB
—

Compressive Strength

—
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

616°C1,141 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

142 W/m·K82 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

38 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

150%
120%

Weldability

30 / 100
78 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

80%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

85 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

52.9 mm²/s
58.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356308.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability308.0356
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

308.0 vs 356 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than 308.0?

Yes. 356 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for 308.0 — about 69% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 195 MPa (28.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 308.0 or 356?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 308.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 308.0 or 356?

356. Its weldability rates very good (78/100) against poor (30/100) for 308.0.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 308.0 and 356 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.