FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 238.0 vs 356

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 238.0 and 356 are both aluminum grades. 356 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for 238.0, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 207 MPa (30 ksi). 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 1.5% for 238.0, and 238.0 is harder (100 HB vs 80 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.95 g/cm³ for 238.0) and 238.0 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 356 welds better (very good vs poor) and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 238.0 (standard, $$).

238.0Choose it when the part sees heat.

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

238.0 vs 356: properties

238.0356

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
72.4 GPa10.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

207 MPa30 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
5%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
179 MPa26 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

100 HB
80 HB

Compressive Strength

—
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Same in both: Shear Modulus 27 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

510°C950 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

599°C1,110 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.4 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

25 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.72 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
120%

Weldability

22 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

189 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

35.2 mm²/s
58.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356238.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability238.0356
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

238.0 vs 356 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than 238.0?

Yes. 356 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for 238.0 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 207 MPa (30 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 238.0 or 356?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 238.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 238.0 or 356?

356. Its weldability rates very good (78/100) against poor (22/100) for 238.0.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 238.0 and 356 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.