FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2319 vs ER4009

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2319 and ER4009 are both aluminum grades. ER4009 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for 2319, about 14% more. In exchange, 2319 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 3% for ER4009. ER4009 is lighter (2.71 g/cm³ vs 2.84 g/cm³ for 2319) and 2319 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 2319 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER4009 (high, $$$$).

2319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ER4009Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

2319 vs ER4009: properties

2319ER4009

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

73 GPa10.6 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
3%

Shear Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 200 MPa29 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 60 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

543°C1,009 °F
546°C1,015 °F

Liquidus Temperature

643°C1,189 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.3 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

385 J/g166 BTU/lb
400 J/g172 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

44 % IACS
37 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.64 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
130%

Weldability

92 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
158 MJ/kg67,928 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
74 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

83 kJ/m³
110 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

69.3 mm²/s
55.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2319ER4009

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2319ER4009
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

2319 vs ER4009 — frequently asked

Is ER4009 stronger than 2319?

Yes. ER4009 has a typical yield strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for 2319 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 200 MPa (29 ksi) vs 200 MPa (29 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2319 or ER4009?

2319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ER4009 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 2319 or ER4009?

2319. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against excellent (85/100) for ER4009.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2319 and ER4009 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.