FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 204.0 vs 356

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 204.0 and 356 are both aluminum grades. 204.0 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 262 MPa (38 ksi) for 356, about 22% more. 204.0 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 5% for 356, and 204.0 is harder (95 HB vs 80 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.8 g/cm³ for 204.0) and 356 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 121 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 204.0 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), 356 welds better (very good vs poor), and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 204.0 (premium, $$$).

204.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

204.0 vs 356: properties

204.0356

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
72.4 GPa10.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
5%

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
179 MPa26 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
80 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Same in both: Shear Modulus 27 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

571°C1,060 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

121 W/m·K69.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.7 µm/m·K12.6 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.7 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
120%

Weldability

25 / 100
78 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

264 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48 mm²/s
58.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356204.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability204.0356
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

204.0 vs 356 — frequently asked

Is 204.0 stronger than 356?

Yes. 204.0 has a typical tensile strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 262 MPa (38 ksi) for 356 — about 22% more.

Which is cheaper, 204.0 or 356?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 204.0 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 204.0 or 356?

204.0. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (70/100) for 356; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then 204.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 204.0 and 356 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.