FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1100 vs SAlSi-1

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1100 and SAlSi-1 are both aluminum grades. 1100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for SAlSi-1, about 109% more. SAlSi-1 is harder — 40 HB against 32 HB for 1100 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. SAlSi-1 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 1100 conducts heat better (222 W/m·K vs 163 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 1100 forms better (excellent vs good) and 1100 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than SAlSi-1 (premium, $$$).

1100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

SAlSi-1Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when the part sees heat.

1100 vs SAlSi-1: properties

1100SAlSi-1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Shear Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
103 MPa14.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

48 MPa7 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

32 HB
40 HB

Hardness, Vickers

35 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

643°C1,189 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
632°C1,170 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

222 W/m·K128 BTU/hr·ft·°F
163 W/m·K94.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-273°C-459 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

57 % IACS
42 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in
4.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.61 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
—

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

92 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

96 kJ/m³
22 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

90.6 mm²/s
67.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1100SAlSi-1

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1100SAlSi-1
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

1100 vs SAlSi-1 — frequently asked

Is 1100 stronger than SAlSi-1?

Yes. 1100 has a typical yield strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for SAlSi-1 — about 109% more. Tensile strength is 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1100 or SAlSi-1?

1100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while SAlSi-1 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1100 or SAlSi-1?

SAlSi-1, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for 1100.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1100 and SAlSi-1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.