FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1100 vs SAlMg-2

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1100 and SAlMg-2 are both aluminum grades. SAlMg-2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for 1100, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 125 MPa (18.1 ksi). SAlMg-2 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 12% for 1100, and SAlMg-2 is harder (70 HB vs 32 HB). 1100 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 1100 conducts heat better (222 W/m·K vs 117 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 1100 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than SAlMg-2 (premium, $$$).

1100Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

SAlMg-2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1100 vs SAlMg-2: properties

1100SAlMg-2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
20%

Shear Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
179 MPa26 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

48 MPa7 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

32 HB
70 HB

Hardness, Vickers

35 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

643°C1,189 °F
575°C1,067 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

222 W/m·K128 BTU/hr·ft·°F
117 W/m·K67.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.9 µm/m·K13.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-273°C-459 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

57 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in
5.95×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.34 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
65 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

92 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Weldability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

25%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
110 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

96 kJ/m³
110 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

90.6 mm²/s
49.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1100SAlMg-2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1100SAlMg-2
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

1100 vs SAlMg-2 — frequently asked

Is SAlMg-2 stronger than 1100?

Yes. SAlMg-2 has a typical yield strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for 1100 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 125 MPa (18.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1100 or SAlMg-2?

1100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while SAlMg-2 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 1100 over SAlMg-2?

Pick 1100 when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick SAlMg-2 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1100 and SAlMg-2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.