FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1100 vs ER5556

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1100 and ER5556 are both aluminum grades. ER5556 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for 1100, about 30% more; tensile strength follows at 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 125 MPa (18.1 ksi). ER5556 is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 12% for 1100, and ER5556 is harder (75 HB vs 32 HB). 1100 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 1100 conducts heat better (222 W/m·K vs 116 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 1100 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ER5556 (premium, $$$).

1100Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ER5556Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1100 vs ER5556: properties

1100ER5556

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
17%

Shear Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

48 MPa7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

32 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Vickers

35 HV
82 HV

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Compressive Strength

—
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
40 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

643°C1,189 °F
568°C1,054 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

222 W/m·K128 BTU/hr·ft·°F
116 W/m·K67 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
24.2 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-273°C-459 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

57 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in
5.95×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.34 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

92 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Castability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

96 kJ/m³
158 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

90.6 mm²/s
48.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1100ER5556

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1100ER5556
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

1100 vs ER5556 — frequently asked

Is ER5556 stronger than 1100?

Yes. ER5556 has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for 1100 — about 30% more. Tensile strength is 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 125 MPa (18.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1100 or ER5556?

1100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ER5556 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1100 or ER5556?

ER5556, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for 1100.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1100 and ER5556 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.