FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1100 vs ER4643

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1100 and ER4643 are both aluminum grades. ER4643 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for 1100, about 49% more. In exchange, 1100 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 8% for ER4643, and ER4643 is harder (45 HB vs 32 HB). ER4643 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 1100 conducts heat better (222 W/m·K vs 160 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 1100 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ER4643 (premium, $$$).

1100Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ER4643Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

1100 vs ER4643: properties

1100ER4643

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
8%

Shear Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

48 MPa7 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

32 HB
45 HB

Hardness, Vickers

35 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 115 MPa16.7 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

643°C1,189 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

222 W/m·K128 BTU/hr·ft·°F
160 W/m·K92.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-273°C-459 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

57 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
40%

Weldability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

92 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
69 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

96 kJ/m³
94 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

90.6 mm²/s
66.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1100ER4643

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1100ER4643
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

1100 vs ER4643 — frequently asked

Is ER4643 stronger than 1100?

Yes. ER4643 has a typical tensile strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for 1100 — about 49% more.

Which is cheaper, 1100 or ER4643?

1100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ER4643 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1100 or ER4643?

ER4643, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for 1100.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1100 and ER4643 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.