FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1060 vs 5954

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1060 and 5954 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5954 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for 1060, about 7.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi). In exchange, 1060 is the more ductile: elongation 43% versus 15% for 5954, and 5954 is harder (67 HB vs 19 HB). 1060 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 65°C continuous) and 1060 conducts heat better (234 W/m·K vs 126 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 1060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5954 (standard, $$).

1060Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

5954Choose it when strength drives the design.

1060 vs 5954: properties

10605954

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

68 GPa9.9 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
15%

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

19 HB
67 HB

Hardness, Vickers

21 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

646°C1,195 °F
593°C1,099 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
643°C1,189 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

234 W/m·K135 BTU/hr·ft·°F
126 W/m·K72.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.9 µm/m·K13.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

62 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.78×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.09 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.86 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
40 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

97 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

6 kJ/m³
300 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

96.1 mm²/s
52.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10605954

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10605954
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

1060 vs 5954 — frequently asked

Is 5954 stronger than 1060?

Yes. 5954 has a typical yield strength of 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for 1060 — about 7.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1060 or 5954?

1060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5954 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1060 or 5954?

5954. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (32/100) for 1060; for welding the order is 1060 first (excellent, 95/100) then 5954 (excellent, 88/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1060 and 5954 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.