FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1060 vs 1100A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1060 and 1100A are both aluminum grades. 1100A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for 1060, about 4.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi). In exchange, 1060 is the more ductile: elongation 43% versus 9% for 1100A, and 1100A is harder (32 HB vs 19 HB). 1060 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 1100A (standard, $$).

1060Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1100AChoose it when strength drives the design.

1060 vs 1100A: properties

10601100A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
9%

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

19 HB
32 HB

Hardness, Vickers

21 HV
35 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 68 GPa9.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

646°C1,195 °F
643°C1,189 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

234 W/m·K135 BTU/hr·ft·°F
222 W/m·K128 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

62 % IACS
57 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.78×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.09 µΩ·in
3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

97 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Weldability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
46 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

6 kJ/m³
96 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

96.1 mm²/s
90.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
17

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.5 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10601100A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10601100A
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

1060 vs 1100A — frequently asked

Is 1100A stronger than 1060?

Yes. 1100A has a typical yield strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for 1060 — about 4.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1060 or 1100A?

1060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 1100A is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 1060 over 1100A?

Pick 1060 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat. Pick 1100A when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1060 and 1100A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.