FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1060-H111 vs 1060-O

Aluminum · 1060 temper comparison

1060-H111 and 1060-O are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 1060: H111 (slightly strain hardened) versus O (annealed). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 1060-H111 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for 1060-O, about 14% more. In exchange, 1060-O is the more ductile: elongation 43% versus 32% for 1060-H111, and 1060-H111 is harder (20 HB vs 19 HB). 1060-O runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous).

1060-H111Choose it when strength drives the design.

1060-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1060-H111 vs 1060-O: properties

1060-H1111060-O

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

72 MPa10.4 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

32 MPa4.6 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
43%

Shear Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

20 HB
19 HB

Hardness, Vickers

22 HV
21 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 68 GPa9.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 646°C1,195 °F · Liquidus Temperature 657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 234 W/m·K135 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 62 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.78×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.09 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.84 V · Corrosion Resistance 72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

96 / 100
98 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Weldability 95 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 70 / 100 · Polishability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1060

1060-H111 vs 1060-O — frequently asked

Is 1060-H111 stronger than 1060-O?

Yes. 1060-H111 has a typical yield strength of 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for 1060-O — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, H111 or O?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, 1060-H111 or 1060-O?

1060-H111, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 25/100 for 1060-O.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1060-H111 and 1060-O side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.