FabDigitFabDigit

Marking, decoration & colour · finish comparison

Pad Printing vs Screen Printing

Pad Printing and Screen Printing are both marking & decoration finishes; pad print is the lower-cost option ($).

Pad Printing on a machined part

Pad Printing

Marking & decoration · $ · instant quote

Pad printing transfers ink from an etched plate to a part with a flexible silicone pad.

Screen Printing on a machined part

Screen Printing

Marking & decoration · $ · instant quote

Screen printing pushes ink through a patterned mesh onto a part.

When to choose which

Choose Pad print

Choose Pad print when for small compound-curved surfaces.

  • Prints on compound-curved and recessed geometry
  • Produces a typical 5–10 µm cured ink film
  • Supports a practical line width near 0.15 mm

Choose Screen print

Choose Screen print when for broad flat graphics.

  • Deposits an opaque 10–25 µm ink film
  • Economical for repeated medium-to-large graphics
  • Supports spot colours and high-opacity white ink

What the numbers say

  • Pad print is the lower-cost option ($).
  • Pad print is the thinner coating (5–10 µm), so it disturbs tight fits less.

Scores side by side

Each score is 0–100 against every finish in this catalog. Corrosion is derived from salt-spray test duration and surface hardness from the finish layer's Vickers hardness where a measured figure exists; a finish that leaves the base metal's own surface is not rated for hardness. Cosmetic, lubricity and cost are FabDigit's engineering assessment. Scores and typical figures are screening data, not matched side-by-side tests or service-life rankings; ASTM B117 is a controlled salt-fog method, not a field-life prediction.

ScorePad printScreen print
Corrosion resistance0 Minimal0 Minimal
Surface hardness / wear— —— —
Cosmetic quality72 Very good75 Very good
Lubricity10 Minimal10 Minimal
Cost12 $15 $
CorrosionHardnessCosmeticLubricityEconomy
Pad printScreen print

Key numbers

PropertyPad printScreen print
Thickness5–10 µm10–25 µm
ElectricalUnchangedUnchanged
Coloursblack, white, spot colours, custom colourblack, white, spot colours, custom colour
Relative costBudget ($)Budget ($)
Added lead time3–7 working days3–7 working days
RoHSCompliantCompliant
Instant quoteYesYes

Bold marks the side that is ahead on a row where more (or less, for cost and lead time) is better. Ranges are the typical specification window; the drawing call-out fixes the class.

Which materials take each finish

Material familyPad printScreen print
AluminumYesYes
PolymerYesYes
Stainless SteelYesYes
SteelYesYes
BrassWith careWith care
Copper AlloyWith careWith care
GlassWith careWith care
Magnesium AlloyWith careWith care
Zinc AlloyWith careWith care
TitaniumLimitedLimited

Specifications and drawing call-outs

Pad print

  • ISO 2409 — Paints and Varnishes — Cross-Cut Test

PAD PRINT SYMBOLS, WHITE, 0.15 MM MIN LINE WIDTH, IMAGE 22 × 18 MM MAX, LOCATION ±0.30 MM; ASTM D3359 CLASS 4B MIN

Screen print

  • ISO 2409 — Paints and Varnishes — Cross-Cut Test

SCREEN PRINT LOGO AND LEGENDS, WHITE, 0.20 MM MIN LINE WIDTH; ADHESION PER ASTM D3359, CLASS 4B MIN

Pad print vs Screen print — frequently asked

What is the difference between Pad print and Screen print?

Pad Printing and Screen Printing are both marking & decoration finishes; pad print is the lower-cost option ($). Pad print is the thinner coating (5–10 µm), so it disturbs tight fits less.

When should I use Pad print instead of Screen print?

Choose Pad print when for small compound-curved surfaces. Conversely: choose Screen print when for broad flat graphics.

Is Pad print or Screen print cheaper?

Pad print is the lower-cost finish ($ against $ for Screen print) among the finishes FabDigit quotes. Both are priced per part with a lot minimum; the exact figure appears on the instant quote once the part is uploaded.