FabDigitFabDigit

Zinc Alloy Zamak 2 vs Zamak 5

Zinc Alloy · grade comparison

Zinc Alloy Zamak 2 and Zamak 5 are both zinc alloy grades, both high strength zn. Zamak 2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 283 MPa (41 ksi) against 268 MPa (38.9 ksi) for Zamak 5, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 359 MPa (52.1 ksi) vs 328 MPa (47.6 ksi). Zamak 2 is harder — 100 HB against 91 HB for Zamak 5 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, Zamak 5 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Zamak 2 (standard, $$).

Zamak 2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Zamak 5Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

Zamak 2 vs Zamak 5: properties

Zamak 2Zamak 5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.27

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

359 MPa52.1 ksi
328 MPa47.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

283 MPa41 ksi
268 MPa38.9 ksi

Compressive Strength

641 MPa93 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Shear Strength

317 MPa46 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

59 MPa8.6 ksi
57 MPa8.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

47 J34.7 ft·lbf
65 J47.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

100 HB
91 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
55 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
96 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 96 GPa13.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Elongation at Break 7%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

379°C714 °F
380°C716 °F

Liquidus Temperature

390°C734 °F
386°C727 °F

Same in both: Density 6.6 g/cm³0.24 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

27.8 µm/m·K15.4 µin/in·°F
27.4 µm/m·K15.2 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 110 J/g47.3 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

25 % IACS
26 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.85×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.7 µΩ·in
6.54×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.57 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
38 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

100%
85%

Weldability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
96 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

56 MJ/kg24,076 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
50 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

417 kJ/m³
374 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

38 mm²/s
39.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 14.5 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every zinc alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

205010020055.566.57Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZamak 2Zamak 5

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZamak 2Zamak 5
Casting & forging—Yes
Default conditionAs CastAs Cast
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, E-Coating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Powder Coating.

Zamak 2 vs Zamak 5 — frequently asked

Is Zamak 2 stronger than Zamak 5?

Yes. Zamak 2 has a typical yield strength of 283 MPa (41 ksi) against 268 MPa (38.9 ksi) for Zamak 5 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 359 MPa (52.1 ksi) vs 328 MPa (47.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Zamak 2 or Zamak 5?

Zamak 5 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Zamak 2 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Zamak 2 or Zamak 5?

Zamak 5. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for Zamak 2; for welding the order is Zamak 2 first (poor, 20/100) then Zamak 5 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Zamak 2 and Zamak 5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.