FabDigitFabDigit

Tungsten Alloy W80Cu20 vs WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)

Tungsten Alloy · grade comparison

Tungsten Alloy W80Cu20 and WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) are both tungsten alloy grades. WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,900 MPa (276 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for W80Cu20, about 4.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 2,200 MPa (319 ksi) vs 630 MPa (91.4 ksi). In exchange, W80Cu20 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 2.5% for WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten), and WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) is harder (455 HB vs 205 HB). W80Cu20 is lighter (15.25 g/cm³ vs 19.3 g/cm³ for WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)) and WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) is stiffer (400 GPa vs 260 GPa). On the shop floor, W80Cu20 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended).

W80Cu20Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

W80Cu20 vs WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten): properties

W80Cu20WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

260 GPa37.7 Msi
400 GPa58 Msi

Shear Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
156 GPa22.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

206 GPa29.9 Msi
310 GPa45 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

630 MPa91.4 ksi
2,200 MPa319 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
1,900 MPa276 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
2.5%

Reduction in Area

4%
35%

Compressive Strength

1,150 MPa167 ksi
2,200 MPa319 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

205 HB
455 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

98 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

18 HRC
48 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

215 HV
480 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

15.25 g/cm³0.55 lb/in³
19.3 g/cm³0.7 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,083°C1,981 °F
3,422°C6,192 °F

Liquidus Temperature

3,410°C6,170 °F
3,422°C6,192 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
168 W/m·K97.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

180 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F
132 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.3 µm/m·K4.6 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
2,000°C3,632 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
20°C68 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
192 J/g82.5 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

34 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.01 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.17 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.22 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
8%

Weldability

10 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb
380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
22 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17 MN·m/kg
20.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

425 kJ/m³
4,513 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

69.2 mm²/s
65.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

55
205

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every tungsten alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,500141516171819Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)W80Cu20

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityW80Cu20WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

W80Cu20 vs WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) — frequently asked

Is WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) stronger than W80Cu20?

Yes. WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) has a typical yield strength of 1,900 MPa (276 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for W80Cu20 — about 4.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 2,200 MPa (319 ksi) vs 630 MPa (91.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, W80Cu20 or WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, W80Cu20 or WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)?

W80Cu20. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (12/100) for WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten); for welding the order is WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) first (poor, 15/100) then W80Cu20 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in W80Cu20 and WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.