FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Ti-15-3 vs Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Ti-15-3 and Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr are both titanium grades. Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr is the stronger of the two: yield strength 850 MPa (123 ksi) against 790 MPa (115 ksi) for Ti-15-3, about 8% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 820 MPa (119 ksi). In exchange, Ti-15-3 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 18% for Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr, and Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr is harder (32 HRC vs 27 HRC). Ti-15-3 runs hotter in service (260°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, Ti-15-3 welds better (very good vs good) and Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Ti-15-3 (specialty, $$$$$).

Ti-15-3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4ZrChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Ti-15-3 vs Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr: properties

Ti-15-3Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
86 GPa12.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
33 GPa4.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
90 GPa13.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

820 MPa119 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

790 MPa115 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
18%

Reduction in Area

50%
45%

Compressive Strength

810 MPa117 ksi
880 MPa128 ksi

Shear Strength

540 MPa78.3 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

265 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
32 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

280 HV
320 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Same in both: Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 450 MPa65.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.76 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³
4.82 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,600°C2,912 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,700°C3,092 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

8.1 W/m·K4.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7.6 W/m·K4.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.5 µm/m·K4.7 µin/in·°F
9.4 µm/m·K5.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 365 J/g157 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.2 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.4×10⁻⁶ Ω·m55.1 µΩ·in
1.55×10⁻⁶ Ω·m61 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

16%
15%

Weldability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

750 MJ/kg322,442 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

48 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
800 L/kg95.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

172 kN·m/kg
187 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17.2 MN·m/kg
17.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3,805 kJ/m³
4,201 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
3.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTi-15-3Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTi-15-3Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
TiAlNYes—
TiB2Yes—
TiCNYes—
TiNYes—
WC/CYes—

They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Ti-15-3 vs Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr — frequently asked

Is Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr stronger than Ti-15-3?

Yes. Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr has a typical yield strength of 850 MPa (123 ksi) against 790 MPa (115 ksi) for Ti-15-3 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 820 MPa (119 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Ti-15-3 or Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr?

Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Ti-15-3 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Ti-15-3 or Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr?

Ti-15-3. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ti-15-3 and Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.