FabDigitFabDigit

Steel P1 vs P2

Steel · grade comparison

Steel P1 and P2 are both steel grades. P2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for P1, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 510 MPa (74 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi). In exchange, P1 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 27% for P2, and P1 is harder (120 HB vs 110 HB). P2 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and P1 conducts heat better (50 W/m·K vs 40 W/m·K). On the shop floor, P2 machines more easily (very good vs good), P1 welds better (excellent vs good), and P1 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than P2 (premium, $$$).

P1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

P2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

P1 vs P2: properties

P1P2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
27%

Reduction in Area

62%
58%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Shear Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
110 J81.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
110 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

68 HRB
63 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
115 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

10 / 100
12 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 65%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
65 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

140 kJ/m³
266 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.6 mm²/s
11.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP1P2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityP1P2
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

P1 vs P2 — frequently asked

Is P2 stronger than P1?

Yes. P2 has a typical yield strength of 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for P1 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 510 MPa (74 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, P1 or P2?

P1 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while P2 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, P1 or P2?

P2. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for P1; for welding the order is P1 first (excellent, 85/100) then P2 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in P1 and P2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.