FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 3Cr2Mo vs P2

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 3Cr2Mo and P2 are both steel grades. 3Cr2Mo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 830 MPa (120 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for P2, about 152% more; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi). In exchange, P2 is the more ductile: elongation 27% versus 15% for 3Cr2Mo, and 3Cr2Mo is harder (300 HB vs 110 HB). P2 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 32 W/m·K). On the shop floor, P2 machines more easily (very good vs good), P2 welds better (good vs fair), and 3Cr2Mo sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than P2 (premium, $$$).

3Cr2MoChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

P2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

3Cr2Mo vs P2: properties

3Cr2MoP2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,000 MPa145 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

830 MPa120 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
27%

Reduction in Area

50%
58%

Compressive Strength

860 MPa125 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
110 J81.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
110 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

30 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

315 HV
115 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
63 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.55 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

14 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
65%

Weldability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.4 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

127 kN·m/kg
65 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,640 kJ/m³
266 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8.9 mm²/s
11.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP23Cr2Mo

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability3Cr2MoP2
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

3Cr2Mo vs P2 — frequently asked

Is 3Cr2Mo stronger than P2?

Yes. 3Cr2Mo has a typical yield strength of 830 MPa (120 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for P2 — about 152% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 3Cr2Mo or P2?

3Cr2Mo is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while P2 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 3Cr2Mo or P2?

P2. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for 3Cr2Mo; for welding the order is P2 first (good, 60/100) then 3Cr2Mo (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 3Cr2Mo and P2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.