FabDigitFabDigit

Steel HPM38 vs P1

Steel · grade comparison

Steel HPM38 and P1 are both steel grades. HPM38 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for P1, about 117% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi). In exchange, P1 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 18% for HPM38, and HPM38 is harder (215 HB vs 120 HB). HPM38 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and P1 conducts heat better (50 W/m·K vs 20 W/m·K). On the shop floor, P1 machines more easily (good vs fair), P1 welds better (excellent vs poor), and P1 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than HPM38 (premium, $$$).

HPM38Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

P1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

HPM38 vs P1: properties

HPM38P1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
35%

Reduction in Area

45%
62%

Compressive Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Shear Strength

460 MPa66.7 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

215 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

18 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

225 HV
125 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
68 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.9 % IACS
11 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.35 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

48 / 100
10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
65%

Weldability

25 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

97 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.3 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

660 kJ/m³
140 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.6 mm²/s
13.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP1HPM38

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHPM38P1
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

HPM38 vs P1 — frequently asked

Is HPM38 stronger than P1?

Yes. HPM38 has a typical yield strength of 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for P1 — about 117% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HPM38 or P1?

P1 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while HPM38 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, HPM38 or P1?

P1. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (45/100) for HPM38; for welding the order is P1 first (excellent, 85/100) then HPM38 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HPM38 and P1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.