FabDigitFabDigit

Steel M19 vs M800-65A

Steel · grade comparison

Steel M19 and M800-65A are both steel grades. M19 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M800-65A, about 8% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi). In exchange, M800-65A is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 25% for M19, and M19 is harder (150 HV vs 140 HV). M800-65A conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, M800-65A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than M19 (standard, $$).

M19Choose it when strength drives the design.

M800-65AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

M19 vs M800-65A: properties

M19M800-65A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
28%

Reduction in Area

45%
—

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
74 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

150 HV
140 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

—
133 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.3 % IACS
8.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

15 / 100
22 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
55%

Weldability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
72 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.4 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
55 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

289 kJ/m³
242 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.8 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM19M800-65A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityM19M800-65A
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

M19 vs M800-65A — frequently asked

Is M19 stronger than M800-65A?

Yes. M19 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M800-65A — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, M19 or M800-65A?

M800-65A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while M19 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, M19 or M800-65A?

M800-65A, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for M19; for welding the order is M800-65A first (good, 55/100) then M19 (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in M19 and M800-65A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.