FabDigitFabDigit

Steel M19 vs M47

Steel · grade comparison

Steel M19 and M47 are both steel grades. M47 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for M19, about 68% more; tensile strength follows at 890 MPa (129 ksi) vs 460 MPa (66.7 ksi). In exchange, M19 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 18% for M47, and M47 is harder (268 HV vs 150 HV). M19 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.03 g/cm³ for M47) and M47 is stiffer (218 GPa vs 200 GPa). On the shop floor, M19 machines more easily (fair vs poor), M19 welds better (fair vs poor), and M19 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than M47 (high, $$$$).

M19Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

M47Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

M19 vs M47: properties

M19M47

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
218 GPa31.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
85 GPa12.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
890 MPa129 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
18%

Reduction in Area

45%
30%

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

150 HV
268 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
22 J16.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

—
255 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
25 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
8.03 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,250°C2,282 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,520°C2,768 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.3 % IACS
3.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.55 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
30%

Weldability

50 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb
85 L/kg10.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
111 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

289 kJ/m³
745 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.8 mm²/s
7.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM19M47

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityM19M47
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

M19 vs M47 — frequently asked

Is M47 stronger than M19?

Yes. M47 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for M19 — about 68% more. Tensile strength is 890 MPa (129 ksi) vs 460 MPa (66.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, M19 or M47?

M19 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while M47 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, M19 or M47?

M19. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for M47; for welding the order is M19 first (fair, 50/100) then M47 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in M19 and M47 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.