FabDigitFabDigit

Steel M140-30P vs M19

Steel · grade comparison

Steel M140-30P and M19 are both steel grades. M19 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M140-30P, about 8% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 335 MPa (48.6 ksi). M19 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 10% for M140-30P, and M140-30P is harder (180 HV vs 150 HV). M19 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 120 GPa) and M19 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, M19 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and M19 welds better (fair vs poor).

M19Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

M140-30P vs M19: properties

M140-30PM19

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

335 MPa48.6 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
25%

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
150 HV

Reduction in Area

—
45%

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

265 J/g114 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
3.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

22 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
45%

Weldability

30 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

44 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.7 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

413 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.8 mm²/s
6.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM19M140-30P

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityM140-30PM19
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

M140-30P vs M19 — frequently asked

Is M19 stronger than M140-30P?

Yes. M19 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M140-30P — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 335 MPa (48.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, M140-30P or M19?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, M140-30P or M19?

M19. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for M140-30P; for welding the order is M19 first (fair, 50/100) then M140-30P (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in M140-30P and M19 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.