FabDigitFabDigit

Steel M-6 vs M19

Steel · grade comparison

Steel M-6 and M19 are both steel grades. M19 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M-6, about 8% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). M19 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 8% for M-6, and M-6 is harder (180 HV vs 150 HV). M19 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 120 GPa) and M19 conducts heat better (25 W/m·K vs 22 W/m·K). On the shop floor, M19 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and M19 welds better (50 vs 40 out of 100).

M19Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

M-6 vs M19: properties

M-6M19

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
25%

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
150 HV

Reduction in Area

—
45%

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,480°C2,696 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
3.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 45%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.7 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

413 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6 mm²/s
6.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM19M-6

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityM-6M19
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

M-6 vs M19 — frequently asked

Is M19 stronger than M-6?

Yes. M19 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M-6 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, M-6 or M19?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, M-6 or M19?

M19, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for M-6; for welding the order is M19 first (fair, 50/100) then M-6 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in M-6 and M19 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.