FabDigitFabDigit

Steel H11 vs HP9-4-20

Steel · grade comparison

Steel H11 and HP9-4-20 are both steel grades. HP9-4-20 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,210 MPa (175 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for H11, about 137% more; tensile strength follows at 1,340 MPa (194 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi). In exchange, H11 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 17% for HP9-4-20, and HP9-4-20 is harder (390 HB vs 200 HB). H11 runs hotter in service (540°C vs 400°C continuous) and HP9-4-20 conducts heat better (30 W/m·K vs 25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, H11 machines more easily (good vs poor), HP9-4-20 welds better (very good vs fair), and H11 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than HP9-4-20 (high, $$$$).

H11Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

HP9-4-20Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

H11 vs HP9-4-20: properties

H11HP9-4-20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

800 MPa116 ksi
1,340 MPa194 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

510 MPa74 ksi
1,210 MPa175 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
17%

Reduction in Area

45%
63%

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
390 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
410 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,250 MPa181 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
650 MPa94.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
42 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.83 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,427°C2,601 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,470°C2,678 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

540°C1,004 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.3 % IACS
—

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
30%

Weldability

35 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb
42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Water 70 L/kg8.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

103 kN·m/kg
171 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

619 kJ/m³
3,660 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
8.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleH11HP9-4-20

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityH11HP9-4-20
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

H11 vs HP9-4-20 — frequently asked

Is HP9-4-20 stronger than H11?

Yes. HP9-4-20 has a typical yield strength of 1,210 MPa (175 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for H11 — about 137% more. Tensile strength is 1,340 MPa (194 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi).

Which is cheaper, H11 or HP9-4-20?

H11 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while HP9-4-20 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, H11 or HP9-4-20?

H11. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (28/100) for HP9-4-20; for welding the order is HP9-4-20 first (very good, 70/100) then H11 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in H11 and HP9-4-20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.