FabDigitFabDigit

Steel AR400 vs En52

Steel · grade comparison

Steel AR400 and En52 are both steel grades. AR400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for En52, about 40% more; tensile strength follows at 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi). In exchange, En52 is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 11% for AR400, and AR400 is harder (400 HB vs 285 HB). En52 runs hotter in service (750°C vs 250°C continuous) and AR400 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 23 W/m·K). On the shop floor, En52 machines more easily (32 vs 22 out of 100), AR400 welds better (good vs poor), and En52 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AR400 (premium, $$$).

AR400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

En52Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AR400 vs En52: properties

AR400En52

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
215 GPa31.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
83 GPa12 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,250 MPa181 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,050 MPa152 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
17%

Reduction in Area

40%
45%

Compressive Strength

1,100 MPa160 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Shear Strength

780 MPa113 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
285 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
30 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
300 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
23 W/m·K13.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
750°C1,382 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
2.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
35 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.3 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb
36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

159 kN·m/kg
130 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
27.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

2,689 kJ/m³
1,308 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.4 mm²/s
6.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR400En52

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAR400En52
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionQ&T—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

AR400 vs En52 — frequently asked

Is AR400 stronger than En52?

Yes. AR400 has a typical yield strength of 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for En52 — about 40% more. Tensile strength is 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AR400 or En52?

En52 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AR400 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AR400 or En52?

En52, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 22/100 for AR400; for welding the order is AR400 first (good, 55/100) then En52 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AR400 and En52 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.