FabDigitFabDigit

Steel AR400 vs En39

Steel · grade comparison

Steel AR400 and En39 are both steel grades. AR400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for En39, about 91% more; tensile strength follows at 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi). In exchange, En39 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 11% for AR400, and AR400 is harder (400 HB vs 240 HB). AR400 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 180°C continuous) and AR400 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 34 W/m·K). On the shop floor, En39 machines more easily (fair vs poor), AR400 welds better (good vs poor), and En39 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AR400 (premium, $$$).

AR400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

En39Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

AR400 vs En39: properties

AR400En39

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
207 GPa30 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,250 MPa181 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,050 MPa152 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
18%

Reduction in Area

40%
50%

Compressive Strength

1,100 MPa160 ksi
—

Shear Strength

780 MPa113 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
240 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
23 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
252 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
5.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
14 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
40%

Weldability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb
34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
75 L/kg9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

159 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

2,689 kJ/m³
731 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.4 mm²/s
9.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR400En39

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAR400En39
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionQ&T—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

AR400 vs En39 — frequently asked

Is AR400 stronger than En39?

Yes. AR400 has a typical yield strength of 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for En39 — about 91% more. Tensile strength is 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AR400 or En39?

En39 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AR400 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AR400 or En39?

En39. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (22/100) for AR400; for welding the order is AR400 first (good, 55/100) then En39 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AR400 and En39 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.