FabDigitFabDigit

Steel AR400 vs En34

Steel · grade comparison

Steel AR400 and En34 are both steel grades. AR400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for En34, about 163% more; tensile strength follows at 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). In exchange, En34 is the more ductile: elongation 21% versus 11% for AR400, and AR400 is harder (400 HB vs 180 HB). En34 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, En34 machines more easily (good vs poor) and En34 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than AR400 (premium, $$$).

AR400Choose it when strength drives the design.

En34Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AR400 vs En34: properties

AR400En34

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
207 GPa30 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,250 MPa181 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,050 MPa152 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
21%

Reduction in Area

40%
55%

Compressive Strength

1,100 MPa160 ksi
—

Shear Strength

780 MPa113 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
89 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
2.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.27 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 8 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
13 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
60%

Weldability

55 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
58 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

159 kN·m/kg
79 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

2,689 kJ/m³
386 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.4 mm²/s
11.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR400En34

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAR400En34
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionQ&T—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

AR400 vs En34 — frequently asked

Is AR400 stronger than En34?

Yes. AR400 has a typical yield strength of 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for En34 — about 163% more. Tensile strength is 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AR400 or En34?

En34 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while AR400 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AR400 or En34?

En34. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against poor (22/100) for AR400; for welding the order is En34 first (good, 62/100) then AR400 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AR400 and En34 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.