FabDigitFabDigit

Steel AerMet 310-ANN vs AerMet 310 NORM

Steel · AerMet 310 temper comparison

AerMet 310-ANN and AerMet 310 NORM are two conditions of the same steel grade, AerMet 310: ANN (annealed) versus NORM (normalized). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. AerMet 310 NORM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,270 MPa (184 ksi) against 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) for AerMet 310-ANN, about 23% more; tensile strength follows at 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 1,280 MPa (186 ksi). In exchange, AerMet 310-ANN is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 11% for AerMet 310 NORM, and AerMet 310 NORM is harder (50 HRC vs 39 HRC). AerMet 310-ANN runs hotter in service (400°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, AerMet 310-ANN machines more easily (30 vs 18 out of 100).

AerMet 310-ANNChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AerMet 310 NORMChoose it when strength drives the design.

AerMet 310-ANN vs AerMet 310 NORM: properties

AerMet 310-ANNAerMet 310 NORM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,280 MPa186 ksi
1,650 MPa239 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,030 MPa149 ksi
1,270 MPa184 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
11%

Reduction in Area

55%
42%

Compressive Strength

2,050 MPa297 ksi
1,320 MPa191 ksi

Shear Strength

1,290 MPa187 ksi
990 MPa144 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

800 MPa116 ksi
650 MPa94.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

24 J17.7 ft·lbf
22 J16.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

39 HRC
50 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

385 HV
513 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 194 GPa28.1 Msi · Shear Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 162 GPa23.5 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,470°C2,678 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -73°C-99 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in
6.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m27.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
18%

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
12 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 45 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 7.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAerMet 310

AerMet 310-ANN vs AerMet 310 NORM — frequently asked

Is AerMet 310 NORM stronger than AerMet 310-ANN?

Yes. AerMet 310 NORM has a typical yield strength of 1,270 MPa (184 ksi) against 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) for AerMet 310-ANN — about 23% more. Tensile strength is 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 1,280 MPa (186 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, ANN or NORM?

A900 is the default AerMet 310 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither ANN nor NORM). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, AerMet 310-ANN or AerMet 310 NORM?

AerMet 310-ANN, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 18/100 for AerMet 310 NORM.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AerMet 310-ANN and AerMet 310 NORM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.