FabDigitFabDigit

Steel AerMet 310-A875 vs AerMet 310-ANN

Steel · AerMet 310 temper comparison

AerMet 310-A875 and AerMet 310-ANN are two conditions of the same steel grade, AerMet 310: A875 (hardened + aged 468 °C (875 °F) 5 h) versus ANN (annealed). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. AerMet 310-A875 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 2,000 MPa (290 ksi) against 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) for AerMet 310-ANN, about 94% more; tensile strength follows at 2,210 MPa (321 ksi) vs 1,280 MPa (186 ksi). In exchange, AerMet 310-ANN is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 9% for AerMet 310-A875, and AerMet 310-A875 is harder (58 HRC vs 39 HRC). On the shop floor, AerMet 310-ANN machines more easily (poor vs not recommended).

AerMet 310-A875Choose it when strength drives the design.

AerMet 310-ANNChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

AerMet 310-A875 vs AerMet 310-ANN: properties

AerMet 310-A875AerMet 310-ANN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2,210 MPa321 ksi
1,280 MPa186 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

2,000 MPa290 ksi
1,030 MPa149 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
15%

Reduction in Area

42%
55%

Compressive Strength

2,150 MPa312 ksi
2,050 MPa297 ksi

Shear Strength

1,330 MPa193 ksi
1,290 MPa187 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

830 MPa120 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

57 MPa·√m51.9 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
24 J17.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

58 HRC
39 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

665 HV
385 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 194 GPa28.1 Msi · Shear Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 162 GPa23.5 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,470°C2,678 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -73°C-99 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

13 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

13%
30%

Formability (cold)

6 / 100
8 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 45 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 7.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAerMet 310

AerMet 310-A875 vs AerMet 310-ANN — frequently asked

Is AerMet 310-A875 stronger than AerMet 310-ANN?

Yes. AerMet 310-A875 has a typical yield strength of 2,000 MPa (290 ksi) against 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) for AerMet 310-ANN — about 94% more. Tensile strength is 2,210 MPa (321 ksi) vs 1,280 MPa (186 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, A875 or ANN?

A900 is the default AerMet 310 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither A875 nor ANN). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, AerMet 310-A875 or AerMet 310-ANN?

AerMet 310-ANN. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (13/100) for AerMet 310-A875.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AerMet 310-A875 and AerMet 310-ANN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.