Steel A606 Type 4 vs A656 Grade 80
Steel · grade comparison
Steel A606 Type 4 and A656 Grade 80 are both steel grades. A656 Grade 80 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 590 MPa (85.6 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for A606 Type 4, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 680 MPa (98.6 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi). In exchange, A606 Type 4 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 18% for A656 Grade 80, and A656 Grade 80 is harder (215 HB vs 155 HB). A606 Type 4 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, A606 Type 4 machines more easily (good vs fair) and A606 Type 4 welds better (excellent vs very good).
A606 Type 4Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
A656 Grade 80Choose it when strength drives the design.
A606 Type 4 vs A656 Grade 80: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Hardness, Rockwell C
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Melting Point (Solidus)
Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,510°C2,750 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Brazeability / Solderability
Same in both: Formability (cold) 62 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.1 kg CO₂/kg
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | A606 Type 4 | A656 Grade 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $ Budget | $ Budget |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.
A606 Type 4 vs A656 Grade 80 — frequently asked
Is A656 Grade 80 stronger than A606 Type 4?
Yes. A656 Grade 80 has a typical yield strength of 590 MPa (85.6 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for A606 Type 4 — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 680 MPa (98.6 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi).
Which is cheaper, A606 Type 4 or A656 Grade 80?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, A606 Type 4 or A656 Grade 80?
A606 Type 4. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (48/100) for A656 Grade 80; for welding the order is A606 Type 4 first (excellent, 85/100) then A656 Grade 80 (very good, 72/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A606 Type 4 and A656 Grade 80 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.