FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A588 vs AR400

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A588 and AR400 are both steel grades. AR400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for A588, about 176% more; tensile strength follows at 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, A588 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 11% for AR400, and AR400 is harder (400 HB vs 155 HB). A588 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 250°C continuous) and A588 conducts heat better (52 W/m·K vs 42 W/m·K). On the shop floor, A588 machines more easily (good vs poor), A588 welds better (very good vs good), and A588 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AR400 (premium, $$$).

A588Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AR400Choose it when strength drives the design.

A588 vs AR400: properties

A588AR400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
1,250 MPa181 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
11%

Reduction in Area

45%
40%

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
400 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

83 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

163 HV
420 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
43 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,520°C2,768 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

52 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.6 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

58%
20%

Weldability

78 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Water 45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

66 kN·m/kg
159 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

361 kJ/m³
2,689 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

14.4 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR400A588

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA588AR400
Default conditionHRQ&T
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

A588 vs AR400 — frequently asked

Is AR400 stronger than A588?

Yes. AR400 has a typical yield strength of 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for A588 — about 176% more. Tensile strength is 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A588 or AR400?

A588 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AR400 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A588 or AR400?

A588. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (22/100) for AR400; for welding the order is A588 first (very good, 78/100) then AR400 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A588 and AR400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.