FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A285 vs P235GH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A285 and P235GH are both steel grades. P235GH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for A285, about 6% more. On the shop floor, P235GH sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A285 (standard, $$).

P235GHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A285 vs P235GH: properties

A285P235GH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
28%

Reduction in Area

55%
58%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
125 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
70 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
130 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,515°C2,759 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,460°C2,660 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

51 W/m·K29.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
247 J/g106 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10.8 % IACS
10.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in
1.65×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

10 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
70%

Weldability

92 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
55 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

156 kJ/m³
167 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
9

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 13.8 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA285P235GH

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA285P235GH
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A285 vs P235GH — frequently asked

Is P235GH stronger than A285?

Yes. P235GH has a typical yield strength of 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for A285 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A285 or P235GH?

P235GH is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A285 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose A285 over P235GH?

Pick P235GH when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A285 and P235GH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.