FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A11 vs T9A

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A11 and T9A are both steel grades. A11 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 410 MPa (59.5 ksi) for T9A, about 46% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, T9A is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 8% for A11, and A11 is harder (269 HB vs 190 HB). A11 is lighter (7.41 g/cm³ vs 7.85 g/cm³ for T9A) and A11 runs hotter in service (425°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, T9A machines more easily (good vs poor) and T9A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A11 (specialty, $$$$$).

A11Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

T9AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A11 vs T9A: properties

A11T9A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

221 GPa32.1 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

85 GPa12.3 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

600 MPa87 ksi
410 MPa59.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
22%

Reduction in Area

20%
40%

Compressive Strength

950 MPa138 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Shear Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

269 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

103 HRB
91 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

26 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

283 HV
200 HV

Bulk Modulus

—
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.41 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

—
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

—
1,470°C2,678 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.6 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.7 % IACS
9.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in
1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

20 / 100
10 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.62 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
60%

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
45 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

121 kN·m/kg
89 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

29.8 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

814 kJ/m³
400 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.2 mm²/s
13 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA11T9A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA11T9A
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A11 vs T9A — frequently asked

Is A11 stronger than T9A?

Yes. A11 has a typical yield strength of 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 410 MPa (59.5 ksi) for T9A — about 46% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A11 or T9A?

T9A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A11 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A11 or T9A?

T9A. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (20/100) for A11.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A11 and T9A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.