FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 905M39 vs AR400

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 905M39 and AR400 are both steel grades. AR400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 710 MPa (103 ksi) for 905M39, about 48% more; tensile strength follows at 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 925 MPa (134 ksi). In exchange, 905M39 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 11% for AR400, and AR400 is harder (400 HB vs 277 HB). 905M39 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 250°C continuous) and AR400 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 33 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 905M39 machines more easily (fair vs poor), AR400 welds better (good vs poor), and 905M39 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AR400 (premium, $$$).

905M39Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AR400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

905M39 vs AR400: properties

905M39AR400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

925 MPa134 ksi
1,250 MPa181 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

710 MPa103 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
11%

Reduction in Area

48%
40%

Compressive Strength

720 MPa104 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

440 MPa63.8 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

277 HB
400 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

28 HRC
43 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

292 HV
420 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.76 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

16 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
20%

Weldability

15 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

31 MJ/kg13,328 BTU/lb
28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

119 kN·m/kg
159 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,200 kJ/m³
2,689 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.2 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR400905M39

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability905M39AR400
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Q&T
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

905M39 vs AR400 — frequently asked

Is AR400 stronger than 905M39?

Yes. AR400 has a typical yield strength of 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) against 710 MPa (103 ksi) for 905M39 — about 48% more. Tensile strength is 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 925 MPa (134 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 905M39 or AR400?

905M39 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AR400 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 905M39 or AR400?

905M39. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (22/100) for AR400; for welding the order is AR400 first (good, 55/100) then 905M39 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 905M39 and AR400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.