FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 50W800 vs M19

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 50W800 and M19 are both steel grades. M19 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 50W800, about 6% more. In exchange, 50W800 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 25% for M19, and 50W800 is harder (78 HRB vs 72 HRB). 50W800 conducts heat better (30 W/m·K vs 25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 50W800 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than M19 (standard, $$).

50W800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

M19Choose it when strength drives the design.

50W800 vs M19: properties

50W800M19

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

440 MPa63.8 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
25%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
72 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
45%

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Shear Strength 320 MPa46.4 ksi · Hardness, Vickers 150 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,515°C2,759 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

4.3 % IACS
3.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m15.7 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
45%

Weldability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

250 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8.4 mm²/s
6.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM1950W800

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50W800M19
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

50W800 vs M19 — frequently asked

Is M19 stronger than 50W800?

Yes. M19 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 50W800 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 440 MPa (63.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 50W800 or M19?

50W800 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while M19 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 50W800 or M19?

50W800. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for M19.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 50W800 and M19 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.