FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 42CrMo4 vs X12CrMo5

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 42CrMo4 and X12CrMo5 are both steel grades. 42CrMo4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for X12CrMo5, about 20% more; tensile strength follows at 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 660 MPa (95.7 ksi). In exchange, X12CrMo5 is the more ductile: elongation 21% versus 14% for 42CrMo4, and 42CrMo4 is harder (245 HB vs 195 HB). X12CrMo5 runs hotter in service (600°C vs 400°C continuous) and 42CrMo4 conducts heat better (42.6 W/m·K vs 37 W/m·K).

42CrMo4Choose it when strength drives the design.

X12CrMo5Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

42CrMo4 vs X12CrMo5: properties

42CrMo4X12CrMo5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
213 GPa30.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
82 GPa11.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

850 MPa123 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
21%

Reduction in Area

40%
58%

Compressive Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Shear Strength

510 MPa74 ksi
410 MPa59.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
95 MPa·√m86.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

245 HB
195 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
17 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

258 HV
205 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.78 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
37 W/m·K21.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.55 V

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
53 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
58%

Weldability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
32 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
27.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

720 kJ/m³
497 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.5 mm²/s
10.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo4X12CrMo5

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability42CrMo4X12CrMo5
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

42CrMo4 vs X12CrMo5 — frequently asked

Is 42CrMo4 stronger than X12CrMo5?

Yes. 42CrMo4 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for X12CrMo5 — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 660 MPa (95.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 42CrMo4 or X12CrMo5?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 42CrMo4 or X12CrMo5?

X12CrMo5. Its weldability rates fair (40/100) against fair (35/100) for 42CrMo4.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 42CrMo4 and X12CrMo5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.