FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 31CrMoV9 vs 42CrMo4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 31CrMoV9 and 42CrMo4 are both steel grades. 31CrMoV9 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 880 MPa (128 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4, about 60% more; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 850 MPa (123 ksi). In exchange, 42CrMo4 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 12% for 31CrMoV9, and 31CrMoV9 is harder (330 HB vs 245 HB). 31CrMoV9 runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous) and 42CrMo4 conducts heat better (42.6 W/m·K vs 36 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 42CrMo4 machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100) and 42CrMo4 welds better (fair vs poor).

31CrMoV9Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

42CrMo4Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

31CrMoV9 vs 42CrMo4: properties

31CrMoV942CrMo4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,100 MPa160 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

880 MPa128 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
14%

Reduction in Area

45%
40%

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Shear Strength

660 MPa95.7 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

510 MPa74 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

330 HB
245 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

34 HRC
23 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

345 HV
258 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 210 GPa30.5 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

465 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

—
7.8 % IACS

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

16 / 100
12 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
55%

Weldability

20 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

140 kN·m/kg
108 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,844 kJ/m³
720 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.9 mm²/s
11.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
14

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.8 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo431CrMoV9

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability31CrMoV942CrMo4
Default conditionQ&THR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

31CrMoV9 vs 42CrMo4 — frequently asked

Is 31CrMoV9 stronger than 42CrMo4?

Yes. 31CrMoV9 has a typical yield strength of 880 MPa (128 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4 — about 60% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 850 MPa (123 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 31CrMoV9 or 42CrMo4?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 31CrMoV9 or 42CrMo4?

42CrMo4, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for 31CrMoV9; for welding the order is 42CrMo4 first (fair, 35/100) then 31CrMoV9 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 31CrMoV9 and 42CrMo4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.