FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 4118 vs 4620

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 4118 and 4620 are both steel grades. 4620 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) for 4118, about 8% more. 4620 is harder — 163 HB against 149 HB for 4118 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 4118 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 4620 (standard, $$).

4118Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

4620Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

4118 vs 4620: properties

41184620

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Shear Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

65 J47.9 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

149 HB
163 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
84 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 26% · Reduction in Area 55%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,505°C2,741 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
8 % IACS

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
-0.61 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
57 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
58 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 65%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

24 MJ/kg10,318 BTU/lb
29 MJ/kg12,468 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

299 kJ/m³
316 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.3 mm²/s
12.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
11

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale46204118

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability41184620
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

4118 vs 4620 — frequently asked

Is 4620 stronger than 4118?

Yes. 4620 has a typical tensile strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) for 4118 — about 8% more.

Which is cheaper, 4118 or 4620?

4118 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 4620 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 4118 or 4620?

4620. Its weldability rates good (65/100) against good (60/100) for 4118.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4118 and 4620 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.