FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 40CrNiMoA vs HP9-4-30

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 40CrNiMoA and HP9-4-30 are both steel grades. HP9-4-30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) against 950 MPa (138 ksi) for 40CrNiMoA, about 47% more; tensile strength follows at 1,655 MPa (240 ksi) vs 1,080 MPa (157 ksi). In exchange, 40CrNiMoA is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 13% for HP9-4-30, and HP9-4-30 is harder (461 HB vs 320 HB). 40CrNiMoA conducts heat better (44 W/m·K vs 24 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 40CrNiMoA machines more easily (fair vs poor), HP9-4-30 welds better (fair vs poor), and 40CrNiMoA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than HP9-4-30 (high, $$$$).

40CrNiMoAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

HP9-4-30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

40CrNiMoA vs HP9-4-30: properties

40CrNiMoAHP9-4-30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,080 MPa157 ksi
1,655 MPa240 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

950 MPa138 ksi
1,400 MPa203 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
13%

Reduction in Area

58%
45%

Compressive Strength

980 MPa142 ksi
1,450 MPa210 ksi

Shear Strength

660 MPa95.7 ksi
995 MPa144 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
34 J25.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

320 HB
461 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

34 HRC
48 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

335 HV
490 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.84 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-73°C-99 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7 % IACS
3.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.48×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.76 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

15 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
15%

Weldability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb
85 L/kg10.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

138 kN·m/kg
211 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.4 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

2,180 kJ/m³
4,900 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.8 mm²/s
6.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale40CrNiMoAHP9-4-30

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability40CrNiMoAHP9-4-30
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionQ&T—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

40CrNiMoA vs HP9-4-30 — frequently asked

Is HP9-4-30 stronger than 40CrNiMoA?

Yes. HP9-4-30 has a typical yield strength of 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) against 950 MPa (138 ksi) for 40CrNiMoA — about 47% more. Tensile strength is 1,655 MPa (240 ksi) vs 1,080 MPa (157 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 40CrNiMoA or HP9-4-30?

40CrNiMoA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while HP9-4-30 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 40CrNiMoA or HP9-4-30?

40CrNiMoA. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (25/100) for HP9-4-30; for welding the order is HP9-4-30 first (fair, 45/100) then 40CrNiMoA (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 40CrNiMoA and HP9-4-30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.