FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35W300 vs M19

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35W300 and M19 are both steel grades. M19 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 35W300, about 6% more. 35W300 is harder — 180 HV against 150 HV for M19 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, M19 forms better (65 vs 55 out of 100) and 35W300 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than M19 (standard, $$).

35W300Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when cost is the deciding factor.

M19Choose it when strength drives the design.

35W300 vs M19: properties

35W300M19

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
25%

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
150 HV

Reduction in Area

—
45%

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,505°C2,741 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 260 J/g112 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
3.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
15 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
45%

Weldability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

256 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
6.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM1935W300

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35W300M19
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

35W300 vs M19 — frequently asked

Is M19 stronger than 35W300?

Yes. M19 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 35W300 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35W300 or M19?

35W300 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while M19 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 35W300 or M19?

M19. Its weldability rates fair (50/100) against fair (45/100) for 35W300.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35W300 and M19 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.