FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35CrMnSiA vs 55Cr3

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35CrMnSiA and 55Cr3 are both steel grades. 35CrMnSiA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) against 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) for 55Cr3, about 192% more; tensile strength follows at 1,700 MPa (247 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi). In exchange, 55Cr3 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 10% for 35CrMnSiA, and 35CrMnSiA is harder (460 HB vs 225 HB). 55Cr3 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 200°C continuous) and 55Cr3 conducts heat better (44 W/m·K vs 34 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 55Cr3 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 35CrMnSiA sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 55Cr3 (standard, $$).

35CrMnSiAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

55Cr3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

35CrMnSiA vs 55Cr3: properties

35CrMnSiA55Cr3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
79.5 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,700 MPa247 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,400 MPa203 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
16%

Reduction in Area

43%
40%

Compressive Strength

1,450 MPa210 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Shear Strength

1,020 MPa148 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

760 MPa110 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in
85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

35 J25.8 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

460 HB
225 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

48 HRC
20 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

490 HV
236 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
98 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.82 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
465 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.6 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Electrical Conductivity

—
7.8 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
55%

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

29 MJ/kg12,468 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Water 45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

217 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

4,780 kJ/m³
559 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.3 mm²/s
12.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
14

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.2 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale55Cr335CrMnSiA

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35CrMnSiA55Cr3
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

35CrMnSiA vs 55Cr3 — frequently asked

Is 35CrMnSiA stronger than 55Cr3?

Yes. 35CrMnSiA has a typical yield strength of 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) against 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) for 55Cr3 — about 192% more. Tensile strength is 1,700 MPa (247 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35CrMnSiA or 55Cr3?

35CrMnSiA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 55Cr3 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 35CrMnSiA or 55Cr3?

55Cr3. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (30/100) for 35CrMnSiA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35CrMnSiA and 55Cr3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.