FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35# vs ZG65Mn

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35# and ZG65Mn are both steel grades. ZG65Mn is the stronger of the two: yield strength 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for 35#, about 70% more; tensile strength follows at 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi). In exchange, 35# is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 8% for ZG65Mn, and ZG65Mn is harder (250 HB vs 160 HB). 35# runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and 35# conducts heat better (49 W/m·K vs 44 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 35# machines more easily (good vs fair), 35# welds better (good vs poor), and 35# sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZG65Mn (standard, $$).

35#Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ZG65MnChoose it when strength drives the design.

35# vs ZG65Mn: properties

35#ZG65Mn

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
880 MPa128 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
8%

Reduction in Area

50%
14%

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
18 J13.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
250 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

83 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

168 HV
263 HV

Compressive Strength

—
900 MPa131 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
25 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.81 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

49 W/m·K28.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

477 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

11 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
50%

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
62 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

71 kN·m/kg
113 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.4 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

263 kJ/m³
765 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.1 mm²/s
12 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale35#ZG65Mn

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35#ZG65Mn
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

35# vs ZG65Mn — frequently asked

Is ZG65Mn stronger than 35#?

Yes. ZG65Mn has a typical yield strength of 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for 35# — about 70% more. Tensile strength is 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35# or ZG65Mn?

35# is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZG65Mn is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 35# or ZG65Mn?

35#. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (38/100) for ZG65Mn; for welding the order is 35# first (good, 55/100) then ZG65Mn (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35# and ZG65Mn side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.