FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 23QG090 vs M19

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 23QG090 and M19 are both steel grades. M19 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 23QG090, about 8% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). M19 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 10% for 23QG090, and 23QG090 is harder (190 HV vs 150 HV). M19 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 120 GPa) and M19 conducts heat better (25 W/m·K vs 22 W/m·K). On the shop floor, M19 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and M19 welds better (fair vs poor).

M19Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

23QG090 vs M19: properties

23QG090M19

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

65 GPa9.4 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
25%

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

6 J4.4 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
150 HV

Reduction in Area

—
45%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,470°C2,678 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
3.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
45%

Weldability

25 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

70 L/kg8.4 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.7 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

413 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6 mm²/s
6.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM1923QG090

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability23QG090M19
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

23QG090 vs M19 — frequently asked

Is M19 stronger than 23QG090?

Yes. M19 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 23QG090 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 23QG090 or M19?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 23QG090 or M19?

M19, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for 23QG090; for welding the order is M19 first (fair, 50/100) then 23QG090 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 23QG090 and M19 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.