FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni350 vs 8620

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18Ni350 and 8620 are both steel grades. 18Ni350 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 2,300 MPa (334 ksi) against 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) for 8620, about 6.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 2,400 MPa (348 ksi) vs 635 MPa (92.1 ksi). In exchange, 8620 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 7% for 18Ni350. 8620 is stiffer (205 GPa vs 190 GPa) and 8620 conducts heat better (46.6 W/m·K vs 15 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 8620 machines more easily (good vs poor) and 8620 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 18Ni350 (high, $$$$).

18Ni350Choose it when strength drives the design.

8620Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

18Ni350 vs 8620: properties

18Ni3508620

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

190 GPa27.6 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

73 GPa10.6 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2,400 MPa348 ksi
635 MPa92.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

2,300 MPa334 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

7%
28%

Reduction in Area

35%
60%

Compressive Strength

2,400 MPa348 ksi
—

Shear Strength

1,400 MPa203 ksi
390 MPa56.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

800 MPa116 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

38 MPa·√m34.6 ksi·√in
85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

14 J10.3 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

57 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

660 HV
—

Hardness, Brinell

—
183 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
90 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.08 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,413°C2,575 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,505°C2,741 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46.6 W/m·K26.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.3 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F
11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.7 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.55 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
11 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
65%

Weldability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

297 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.5 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

13,921 kJ/m³
362 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale862018Ni350

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18Ni3508620
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18Ni350 vs 8620 — frequently asked

Is 18Ni350 stronger than 8620?

Yes. 18Ni350 has a typical yield strength of 2,300 MPa (334 ksi) against 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) for 8620 — about 6.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 2,400 MPa (348 ksi) vs 635 MPa (92.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 18Ni350 or 8620?

8620 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 18Ni350 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 18Ni350 or 8620?

8620. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against poor (18/100) for 18Ni350; for welding the order is 8620 first (good, 60/100) then 18Ni350 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni350 and 8620 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.