FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni(190) vs Maraging 250

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18Ni(190) and Maraging 250 are both steel grades. 18Ni(190) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,280 MPa (186 ksi) against 810 MPa (117 ksi) for Maraging 250, about 58% more; tensile strength follows at 1,330 MPa (193 ksi) vs 1,010 MPa (146 ksi). In exchange, Maraging 250 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 14% for 18Ni(190), and 18Ni(190) is harder (375 HB vs 300 HB). Maraging 250 conducts heat better (25.5 W/m·K vs 20.9 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Maraging 250 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and Maraging 250 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 18Ni(190) (high, $$$$).

18Ni(190)Choose it when strength drives the design.

Maraging 250Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

18Ni(190) vs Maraging 250: properties

18Ni(190)Maraging 250

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

190 GPa27.6 Msi
181 GPa26.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
155 GPa22.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,330 MPa193 ksi
1,010 MPa146 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,280 MPa186 ksi
810 MPa117 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
18%

Reduction in Area

66%
72%

Compressive Strength

1,310 MPa190 ksi
830 MPa120 ksi

Shear Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

155 MPa·√m141 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
130 J95.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

375 HB
300 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

40 HRC
30 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

395 HV
310 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,454°C2,649 °F
1,430°C2,606 °F

Same in both: Density 8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,413°C2,575 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20.9 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25.5 W/m·K14.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

452 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.8 % IACS
2.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in
6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.58 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

32%
45%

Weldability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

166 kN·m/kg
126 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.8 MN·m/kg
22.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

4,312 kJ/m³
1,812 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.8 mm²/s
7.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleMaraging 25018Ni(190)

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18Ni(190)Maraging 250
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18Ni(190) vs Maraging 250 — frequently asked

Is 18Ni(190) stronger than Maraging 250?

Yes. 18Ni(190) has a typical yield strength of 1,280 MPa (186 ksi) against 810 MPa (117 ksi) for Maraging 250 — about 58% more. Tensile strength is 1,330 MPa (193 ksi) vs 1,010 MPa (146 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 18Ni(190) or Maraging 250?

Maraging 250 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 18Ni(190) is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 18Ni(190) or Maraging 250?

Maraging 250, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for 18Ni(190); for welding the order is 18Ni(190) first (excellent, 85/100) then Maraging 250 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni(190) and Maraging 250 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.