FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1095 vs 9260

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1095 and 9260 are both steel grades. 9260 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for 1095, about 18% more; tensile strength follows at 770 MPa (112 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi). 9260 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 13% for 1095, and 9260 is harder (220 HB vs 192 HB). 1095 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 250°C continuous) and 1095 conducts electricity better (9.6 % IACS vs 6.6 % IACS).

1095Choose it when the part sees heat.

9260Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1095 vs 9260: properties

10959260

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

655 MPa95 ksi
770 MPa112 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
20%

Reduction in Area

40%
42%

Compressive Strength

390 MPa56.6 ksi
—

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

6 J4.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
220 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
97 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
230 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,470°C2,678 °F
1,465°C2,669 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

46.7 W/m·K27 BTU/hr·ft·°F
43 W/m·K24.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.4 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.6 % IACS
6.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in
2.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

8 / 100
11 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
55%

Weldability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

83 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

352 kJ/m³
494 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.7 mm²/s
11.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
14

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10959260

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10959260
Default conditionAnnealedAnnealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

1095 vs 9260 — frequently asked

Is 9260 stronger than 1095?

Yes. 9260 has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for 1095 — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 770 MPa (112 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1095 or 9260?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1095 or 9260?

9260. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against poor (15/100) for 1095.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1095 and 9260 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.