FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1008 vs C10E

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1008 and C10E are both steel grades. C10E is the stronger of the two: yield strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008, about 43% more; tensile strength follows at 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). C10E is harder — 120 HB against 86 HB for 1008 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 1008 runs hotter in service (425°C vs 350°C continuous) and 1008 conducts heat better (60 W/m·K vs 50 W/m·K).

1008Choose it when the part sees heat.

C10EChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

1008 vs C10E: properties

1008C10E

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Shear Strength

185 MPa26.8 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
100 J73.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

86 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

45 HRB
67 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
126 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 30%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.87 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,530°C2,786 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,495°C2,723 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

481 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 247 J/g106 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11.5 % IACS
10.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.61 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

48 / 100
52 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
55%

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 95 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 80 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

77 kJ/m³
149 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

15.9 mm²/s
13.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1008C10E

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1008C10E
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1008 vs C10E — frequently asked

Is C10E stronger than 1008?

Yes. C10E has a typical yield strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008 — about 43% more. Tensile strength is 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1008 or C10E?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 1008 over C10E?

Pick 1008 when the part sees heat. Pick C10E when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1008 and C10E side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.