FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel CB7Cu-2 vs CD3MCuN

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel CB7Cu-2 and CD3MCuN are both stainless steel grades. CB7Cu-2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 860 MPa (125 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for CD3MCuN, about 56% more; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 740 MPa (107 ksi). In exchange, CD3MCuN is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 13% for CB7Cu-2, and CB7Cu-2 is harder (311 HB vs 230 HB). CB7Cu-2 conducts heat better (17.8 W/m·K vs 16 W/m·K). On the shop floor, CB7Cu-2 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and CB7Cu-2 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CD3MCuN (high, $$$$).

CB7Cu-2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

CD3MCuNChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CB7Cu-2 vs CD3MCuN: properties

CB7Cu-2CD3MCuN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,000 MPa145 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

860 MPa125 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
32%

Reduction in Area

40%
45%

Compressive Strength

880 MPa128 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Shear Strength

640 MPa92.8 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

105 MPa·√m95.6 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

47 J34.7 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

311 HB
230 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

33 HRC
21 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

325 HV
245 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
98 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,380°C2,516 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17.8 W/m·K10.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F
12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-73°C-99 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

7.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.3 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

38%
22%

Weldability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

68 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
47 MJ/kg20,206 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

128 kN·m/kg
95 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.1 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,887 kJ/m³
756 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.4 mm²/s
4.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCD3MCuNCB7Cu-2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCB7Cu-2CD3MCuN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

CB7Cu-2 vs CD3MCuN — frequently asked

Is CB7Cu-2 stronger than CD3MCuN?

Yes. CB7Cu-2 has a typical yield strength of 860 MPa (125 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for CD3MCuN — about 56% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 740 MPa (107 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CB7Cu-2 or CD3MCuN?

CB7Cu-2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CD3MCuN is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CB7Cu-2 or CD3MCuN?

CB7Cu-2. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (30/100) for CD3MCuN.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CB7Cu-2 and CD3MCuN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.